Next JS vs. Gatsby - Which React Framework to Choose?
Table of contents
Each has pros and cons, and you need to decide which is suitable for your project. NextJS offers some great features, and Gatsby is great for beginners and experienced developers. Gatsby supports client-side and server-side rendering. Its server-side rendering capabilities allow you to pre-render and fetch pages when users visit your page.
Gatsby
When choosing between NextJS and Gatsby, it's important to remember what each is good for. Gatsby has a lower learning curve than NextJS, making it an excellent choice for smaller applications. NextJS is more appropriate for large-scale applications and is optimized for use with Vercel, a popular deployment platform. Both frameworks are also compatible with other tech stacks. Next and Gatsby are good choices for single-person and multi-person applications, and both frameworks can make good choices for various web apps.
Both frameworks offer server-side and client-side rendering support, which is helpful for web apps. When using server-side rendering, HTML files can be pre-rendered on the server, and the data is rendered on the client side when the user views the page. This allows for a faster page load time and lower maintenance.
NextJS
Next and Gatsby both have a lot of similar features. However, the two frameworks have several notable differences. For example, Next comes with a built-in server, while Gatsby does not. However, both frameworks offer Hot Reloading, a popular feature among developers. They both also have code splitting and routing, and caching features.
Gatsby is better for static websites, which consist of a fixed number of HTML pages. A static website is a one-page site, and the content of each page does not change over time. Gatsby is compatible with various CMS systems and is designed to isolate data changes from website content. This allows you to make changes to the content without affecting the structure of your site's code. Consequently, you can hire a reactjs developer, who can reduce development time by using Gatsby.
GraphQL
The first step in determining which React frameworks to use is deciding on your app's size. Gatsby and Next are both excellent choices for smaller to mid-sized applications. Next has many advantages over Gatsby, including Hot Reloading and Code Splitting. However, if you're planning to create an extensive, complex application, Gatsby may not be the right choice.
NextJS was initially designed as a static site generator. It was intended to replace Gatsby, which relied on server-side rendering. However, in its latest version, Next has blurred the lines between the two. It supports next-generation static site generation and a variety of new build time methods.
Community Support
There are some advantages and disadvantages to both NextJS and Gatsby. Both frameworks have excellent community support. The NextJS community is one of the biggest, and it contains quality content updated regularly. It's also available on numerous platforms. On the other hand, the Gatsby community is relatively small, and its resources are limited to chat, agencies, and different agency programs. Gatsby is best suited for smaller-to-mid-sized projects. However, it is slow and can result in errors if the app becomes too large. Moreover, it can produce large JSON files and may experience scalability issues. For this reason, Gatsby is best used for static sites and small applications.
Conclusion
In conclusion,NextJS and Gatsby are both great React js frameworks for businesses. However, NextJS is more suited for businesses that are looking to quickly create custom React apps without a lot of coding. Gatsby, on the other hand, is more geared towards larger businesses with a lot of complex codebase. Ultimately, NextJS and Gatsby are both great options for businesses that want to quickly build custom React apps, but they are not perfect choices for all businesses.